Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, ISSN 1923-2861 print, 1923-287X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Endocrinol Metab and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jem.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 2, April 2026, pages 109-117


Impact of L-Carnitine on Reproductive Outcomes in Women With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Figures

↓  Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the systematic literature search and study selection process, including the number of records identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and finally included in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Risk of bias summary for the included randomized controlled trials assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 1), displaying judgments across six domains for each included study.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Forest plot of ovulation rate in women with PCOS receiving L-carnitine supplementation versus control during controlled ovarian stimulation.
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Forest plot of clinical pregnancy rate in women with PCOS receiving L-carnitine supplementation versus control during controlled ovarian stimulation.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. Forest plot of endometrial thickness in women with PCOS receiving L-carnitine supplementation versus control during controlled ovarian stimulation.
Figure 5.
↓  Figure 6. Forest plot of number of mature follicles in women with PCOS receiving L-carnitine supplementation versus control during controlled ovarian stimulation.
Figure 6.

Table

↓  Table 1. Characteristics of the Included Studies
 
Study IDStudy locationStudy armsSample sizeMaternal age (years)BMIDuration of infertility (years)Type of infertility, n (%)Interventions
PrimarySecondary
BMI: body mass index; CC: clomiphene citrate; GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; LC: L-carnitine; NA: not available.
Hafezi et al, 2024 [14]IranLC group4729.8 ± 427.4 ± 5.26.8 ± 3.940 (85)7 (15)Three tablets of L-carnitine (1,000 mg) daily plus GnRH antagonist protocol.
Control group5030.4 ± 4.327.4 ± 3.76.5 ± 439 (78)11 (22)Placebo plus GnRH antagonist protocol.
Chaleshtori et al, 2022 [19]IranLC group7430.29 ± 2.230.85 ± 1.932.3 ± 1.674 (100)0 (0)150 mg/day oral CC plus 3 g oral L-carnitine daily.
Control group7431.29 ± 4.731.45 ± 5.712.14 ± 1.955 (74)19 (26)150 mg/day oral CC plus placebo.
Sheida et al, 2023 [20]IranLC group4130 ± 5.0128.06 ± 3.385.92 ± 2.9435 (85)6 (15)L-carnitine (3,000 mg) daily plus GnRH antagonist protocol.
Control group3931.57 ± 4.728.22 ± 3.335.95 ± 3.9535 (90)4 (10)Placebo plus GnRH antagonist protocol.
Kortam et al, 2020 [18]EgyptLC group4725.2 ± 3.930 ± 5.22.35 ± 1.534 (72)13 (28)Oral CC (50 mg tablet, two times per day) plus oral L-carnitine supplementation (1 g tablet, three times per day).
Control group4725.8 ± 2.630.4 ± 32.2 ± 0.935 (74)12 (26)Oral CC (50 mg tablet, two times per day) plus placebo.
Gharib, 2019 [13]EgyptLC group2024.65 ± 2.128.25 ± 1.82.8 ± 0.83NANALetrozole (2.5 mg tablets) plus L-carnitine (2 g/day)
Control group2024.15 ± 2.4527.49 ± 2.33.1 ± 1.09NANALetrozole (2.5 mg tablets) plus placebo.
Abd-Elfattah et al, 2019 [17]EgyptLC group2526.12 ± 3.2831.22 ± 2.56NANANA100–150 mg/day oral CC plus L-carnitine (3 g daily)
Control group2525.64 ± 2.6331.79 ± 2.72NANANA100–150 mg/day oral CC plus placebo.